{"id":20137,"date":"2026-09-16T15:58:50","date_gmt":"2026-09-16T15:58:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/gb-47372-power-bank-compliance\/"},"modified":"2026-09-18T13:45:43","modified_gmt":"2026-09-18T13:45:43","slug":"new-mandatory-power-bank-standard","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/fr\/new-mandatory-power-bank-standard\/","title":{"rendered":"China&#8217;s New Mandatory Power Bank Standard: The B2B Buyer&#8217;s 2027 Compliance Playbook"},"content":{"rendered":"<h1>China&#8217;s New Mandatory Power Bank Standard (GB 47372-2026): The B2B Buyer&#8217;s 2027 Compliance Playbook<\/h1>\n<p>If you&#8217;ve placed a power bank order with a Chinese factory since April 2026, you&#8217;ve probably seen a new line item appear on the spec sheet: <strong>&#8220;GB 47372-2026 compliant display or app module.&#8221;<\/strong> Most buyers react by asking the obvious question: <em>&#8220;Do I need this if I&#8217;m not selling into China?&#8221;<\/em> The honest answer in mid-2026 is: maybe not for your home market, but almost certainly for your factory in Shenzhen, your shipments routed through bonded warehouses, and any private-label run large enough to justify a 500-piece MOQ. China produces more than 90% of the world&#8217;s portable chargers by volume. When Beijing writes a new national standard for the category, the ripple effect reaches every brand that touches the supply chain. GB 47372-2026 went into force on April 3, 2026, and it becomes mandatory on <strong>April 1, 2027<\/strong>. The clock just started ticking.<\/p>\n<p>This guide is written for the buyer, brand manager, or sourcing agent trying to understand what GB 47372-2026 actually changes, and how to plan an OEM\/ODM order that ships clean into both Chinese and overseas channels. We&#8217;ll trace the standard back to its source, walk through the three compliance paths the regulation allows, and give you a procurement checklist you can hand to your factory tomorrow morning.<\/p>\n<h2>The One Standard Reshaping Every Power Bank Shipped Through China<\/h2>\n<p>GB 47372-2026 sits in a small family of Chinese national standards that govern consumer electronics safety. It is titled <em>\u300a\u79fb\u52a8\u7535\u6e90\u5b89\u5168\u6280\u672f\u89c4\u8303\u300b<\/em>, which translates to <em>Safety Technical Specification for Mobile Power Supplies<\/em>. The &#8220;GB&#8221; prefix tells you this is a mandatory national standard, not a voluntary recommendation. The two-digit suffix <strong>47372<\/strong> is the unique identifier. The <strong>-2026<\/strong> indicates the publication year.<\/p>\n<p>Three bodies matter when you read a GB standard:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT)<\/strong>, which organized the drafting committee and will own the post-publication implementation rules. Xinhua&#8217;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.news.cn\/tech\/20260409\/e6f91de1dd1e4d6fa2ea1c89826ffb36\/c.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">publication-day coverage<\/a> summarizes the official announcement and its five key requirements.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The Standardization Administration of China (SAC)<\/strong>, which assigns the GB number and oversees public release on the <a href=\"https:\/\/openstd.samr.gov.cn\/bzgk\/gb\/index\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">National Standards Full-Text Public System (\u56fd\u5bb6\u6807\u51c6\u5168\u6587\u516c\u5f00\u7cfb\u7edf)<\/a>, the official source for the standard PDF.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Certification bodies accredited by CNCA<\/strong>, the labs and auditors who will eventually test GB 47372-compliant units against the published test methods.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>For B2B buyers, the practical takeaway is that any factory claiming <em>&#8220;we already meet GB 47372-2026&#8221;<\/em> should be able to point you to one of those three names plus a written test summary. Marketing language without that paperwork is, at best, wishful thinking.<\/p>\n<h2>What GB 47372-2026 Actually Says (and What It Doesn&#8217;t)<\/h2>\n<p>The full standard runs several dozen pages of test methods, sample sizes, and acceptance criteria. The buyer-relevant content clusters around four major upgrades over the older, more generic safety rules the industry had been leaning on (notably GB 31241 for lithium-ion cells used inside devices, which is <em>pas<\/em> the same instrument):<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Stricter thermal runaway containment.<\/strong> Single-cell fault tests now require a measurable time-to-stabilization figure that older rules treated as pass\/fail.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Lower cycle-life claim tolerance.<\/strong> If the spec sheet advertises &#8220;500 cycles to 80%,&#8221; the rated figure can be invalidated only within a 5% margin under the new test, down from 10% in prior guidance.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Mandatory labeling for transport mode.<\/strong> Batteries externes marked as air-shippable must show the UN 38.3 reference and the rated watt-hour figure on the outer packaging. Bare units without labeling are non-compliant regardless of construction quality.<\/li>\n<li><strong>The smart management clause.<\/strong> This is the change that has everyone reaching for the spec sheet. We&#8217;ll break it out in detail below because it is the central question for OEM\/ODM buyers.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>What the standard does <em>pas<\/em> do is force a particular screen size, mandate a particular chipset, or prescribe a specific app protocol. That flexibility is intentional. It is exactly why the standard reads more like a framework than a recipe.<\/p>\n<h2>The April 2027 Deadline and the 12-Month Transition<\/h2>\n<p>The publication-to-mandatory gap is the single most important number for procurement planning. Here is how the calendar breaks down:<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Date<\/th>\n<th>Milestone<\/th>\n<th>What Changes<\/th>\n<th>B2B Buyer Action<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>2026-04-03<\/td>\n<td>GB 47372-2026 published<\/td>\n<td>Standard is final; text available on the SAC public system<\/td>\n<td>Pull the full text; brief your sourcing team<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2026-04-03 to 2027-04-01<\/td>\n<td>12-month transition window<\/td>\n<td>Both old and new compliance paths are acceptable<\/td>\n<td>Place dual-spec test orders on your next batch<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2027-04-01<\/td>\n<td>Mandatory enforcement begins<\/td>\n<td>Only GB 47372-2026-compliant units may be placed on the China market; bonded warehouses begin phased reviews<\/td>\n<td>Audit existing inventory; freeze non-compliant SKUs from China-bound runs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>From 2027-Q3 onward (expected)<\/td>\n<td>Spot inspections and supply-chain audits intensify<\/td>\n<td>CNCA-accredited labs begin announced and unannounced factory audits<\/td>\n<td>Maintain test reports for at least 5 years per article-level requirement<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>The 12-month transition is not a soft suggestion. The transition is the moment when suppliers have a defensible answer for buyers who ask, <em>&#8220;Can I keep my current spec for one more run while you migrate?&#8221;<\/em> The honest answer is yes, until March 31, 2027. But any inventory produced after that date for the China channel must be GB 47372-2026 compliant.<\/p>\n<h2>Why the &#8220;Smart Management&#8221; Clause Is the Real Story<\/h2>\n<p>Open the standard and search the phrase <em>\u667a\u80fd\u7ba1\u7406\u8981\u6c42<\/em>, ou <em>smart management requirements<\/em>. You will find a compact set of obligations that read almost like a feature spec sheet. Translated into plain Anglais, a power bank must be able to:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Monitor key electrical parameters in real time. Voltage, current, and core temperature at minimum, with sampling fast enough to capture abnormal events.<\/li>\n<li>Store abnormal event information locally. When the protection circuits trip, the unit should keep a record accessible for later readout, even if no app is present.<\/li>\n<li>Communicate abnormal state through at least one user-visible channel. The standard is deliberately technology-neutral here. The regulator wants the user or operator to know something is wrong. How that information reaches them is your call.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Industry coverage in the financial press has often paraphrased this clause as <em>&#8220;the regulation requires every power bank to have an LCD screen or a paired app.&#8221;<\/em> That phrasing is closer to a product design hint than a literal reading. The regulation allows a third path, a no-display, no-app design that exposes the data through a diagnostic port or service-mode interface. It would be unusual for retail-grade power banks to skip the user-visible channel entirely.<\/p>\n<h2>Three Paths to Compliance: No Display, LCD Screen, Networked App<\/h2>\n<p>Treat the smart management clause as a three-way switch. The standard defines what the unit must do; you choose how the user sees it. Below are the three paths most OEM\/ODM buyers end up comparing.<\/p>\n<h3>Path 1: No Display, No App (Diagnostic Port or Service Mode)<\/h3>\n<p>Technically compliant if the unit exposes the abnormal event log through a service-mode interface accessible only to factory or warranty technicians. Practically rare for retail SKUs but common for industrial or rental-fleet power banks.<\/p>\n<h3>Path 2: Onboard LCD or TFT Display<\/h3>\n<p>The display shows real-time percentage, voltage, temperature, and any fault codes that have tripped. This is the path most consumer-facing brands are picking because it doubles as a marketing feature. See our guide to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/fr\/tft-power-bank\/\">TFT power bank design and the GB 47372 compliance overlap<\/a> for the screen-side mechanics.<\/p>\n<h3>Path 3: Networked App (BLE, Wi-Fi, or Cellular IoT)<\/h3>\n<p>The unit pairs with a phone app or sends alerts to a cloud dashboard when an abnormal event is detected. BLE (Bluetooth Low Energy) is the cheapest option; Wi-Fi adds hub-free direct routing; 4G IoT modules allow true remote telemetry for fleet operators.<\/p>\n<p>The three paths share the same <em>intelligence<\/em> at the chip level, a battery management system (BMS) that can record and surface abnormal events. They differ entirely in the human interface. That difference is where procurement decisions get made.<\/p>\n<h2>The Compliance Decision Matrix (Cost, Risk, UX, Logistics)<\/h2>\n<p>Below is the matrix most buyers reach for when they have to choose a path and lock the BOM. All figures are 2026 mid-year China-factory ranges for 500-piece MOQ orders and can shift \u00b110% with raw material costs. Use them as a starting point, not a quote.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Path<\/th>\n<th>Unit Cost Adder<\/th>\n<th>Compliance Risk<\/th>\n<th>User Experience<\/th>\n<th>Logistics Note<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>No display, no app<\/td>\n<td>$0.10-$0.40<\/td>\n<td>Medium. Regulator skepticism if retail-facing<\/td>\n<td>Requires service-mode readout, poor for consumers<\/td>\n<td>Simplest air-shipping profile; no battery with screen electronics<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Onboard display (TFT \/ IPS \/ OLED)<\/td>\n<td>$0.80-$3.50<\/td>\n<td>Low. Straightforward test path<\/td>\n<td>Strong. Visible percentage, faults, fast-charge mode<\/td>\n<td>Slightly heavier; some airlines treat display-equipped units as &#8220;smart luggage battery&#8221; with extra paperwork<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Networked app (BLE \/ Wi-Fi \/ 4G)<\/td>\n<td>$1.20-$4.20<\/td>\n<td>Low, but module certification adds time<\/td>\n<td>Strongest. Telemetry, OTA firmware, fleet visibility<\/td>\n<td>4G modules trigger extra radio approvals (SRRC in China, FCC\/CE abroad); BLE only is the leanest<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Note that <em>path 3 plus a small display<\/em> is also legal: the standard is additive, not exclusive. Many brands ending up here start with a BLE-only build, then add a low-cost LCD for the percentage readout because users expect it. The matrix above reflects the most common single-path configurations. Yulida&#8217;s flagship 500-piece-MOQ <a href=\"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/fr\/product\/aj07-ice-sense-magnetic-wireless-power-bank\/\">AJ07 Ice-Sense batterie externe magn\u00e9tique sans fil<\/a> shows what a Path 2 build looks like in production: onboard display, no radio, fully GB 47372-2026-ready.<\/p>\n<p>Compliance risk is roughly inversely correlated with user-visible telemetry. The more the user can see what the unit is doing, the less work the regulator has to do interpreting event logs after the fact. That is the diagnostic intuition behind the clause. It explains why display-equipped units tend to clear audits faster.<\/p>\n<h2>Picking a Display: TFT vs IPS vs OLED vs E-Ink (and When None Is Enough)<\/h2>\n<p>If you picked Path 2 (or a Path 2 + Path 3 hybrid), the next decision is the panel technology. Each has a sweet spot.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>TFT.<\/strong> The cheapest path to a full-color display. Good enough for percentage, voltage, current, and a couple of status icons. This is what most sub-$30 retail power banks with screens now ship with. Read the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/fr\/tft-power-bank\/\">tutorial on TFT power bank sourcing<\/a> for the panel contrast and BOM detail.<\/li>\n<li><strong>IPS.<\/strong> Better viewing angles, slightly higher cost than TFT. Worth it if your brand wants a premium look without going to OLED.<\/li>\n<li><strong>OLED.<\/strong> The deepest blacks, the brightest contrast, and the highest per-unit cost. Power draw is also higher, so an OLED-equipped power bank spends more idle current on the display itself. Reserve OLED for flagship SKUs where you have margin to spare.<\/li>\n<li><strong>E-Ink.<\/strong> Lowest power draw; the image stays on the panel even when the cell is empty. The catch is refresh rate: E-Ink is for percentage and fault icons, not animation. Useful for emergency-preparedness lines.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If you are not placing a screen on the unit, then the diagnostic-port path becomes the user-visible channel of last resort. Make sure your OEM\/ODM partner documents how a service technician reads the event log. That documentation is what proves compliance to the auditor.<\/p>\n<h2>Picking an App: BLE, Wi-Fi, or 4G IoT (and What It Adds to Your BOM)<\/h2>\n<p>App-based compliance is a software problem before it is a hardware problem. The chip is the easy part; the radio module and its certifications are what determines the actual BOM lift.<\/p>\n<h3>BLE: The Lean Default<\/h3>\n<p>A BLE module runs $0.40-$1.10 at 500-piece MOQ, draws almost no idle current, and pairs with a phone in seconds. The certification path is short: SRRC in China, FCC\/CE elsewhere are predictable. Most consumer-facing GB 47372-2026 Path 3 builds start here.<\/p>\n<h3>Wi-Fi: The Hub-Skipping Middle Tier<\/h3>\n<p>Wi-Fi direct removes the phone from the loop. Useful if you are building a fleet or rental product where the operator wants telemetry without requiring users to install an app. Power draw is meaningfully higher than BLE, but the deployment model is more flexible. Wi-Fi adds $1.20-$2.50 to the unit cost.<\/p>\n<h3>4G IoT: The Fleet Option<\/h3>\n<p>A 4G IoT module lets the unit talk to a server without any local user device. This is what rental fleets, logistics trackers, and disaster-preparedness kits use. The BOM adder runs $3.50-$5.50, but you also have to pay for the cellular plan and absorb the radio certification timeline, which can add 6-10 weeks to your first production run.<\/p>\n<p>Across all three, the App itself is the cheapest line item. A BLE companion app is a small project; a fleet dashboard is a real product surface. Talk to your OEM\/ODM partner about whether they ship the app under your brand or hand you a reference design. Many Yulida partners go with the latter because it lets them keep their own dev cycle independent of the factory.<\/p>\n<h2>Where GB 47372-2026 Sits Next to CE, FCC, UN38.3, and CCC<\/h2>\n<p>A common buyer question is whether GB 47372-2026 lets you skip other certifications. The short answer is no. The new standard layers on top of what already exists rather than replacing it.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>UN38.3.<\/strong> Still mandatory for any lithium power bank shipped by air. GB 47372-2026 references it explicitly. If your air-shipping paperwork is in order, GB 47372-2026 will not ask for it twice.<\/li>\n<li><strong>CE (Europe).<\/strong> CE-EMC and CE-LVD remain gateway requirements for the EU market. GB 47372-2026 does not substitute for either, and CE-EMC test reports are useful supporting evidence for the GB smart-management clause.<\/li>\n<li><strong>FCC (US).<\/strong> FCC Part 15 still governs any radio-equipped power bank. If you chose a Path 3 with BLE, Wi-Fi, or 4G, FCC paperwork is unavoidable regardless of GB 47372-2026.<\/li>\n<li><strong>CCC (China 3C).<\/strong> A common confusion: <strong>GB 47372-2026 is a technical standard; CCC is the certification scheme.<\/strong> They are not the same thing. Until CNCA maps GB 47372-2026 into the CCC framework, GB 47372-2026 compliance is voluntary except where the factory has contractually committed to it. From 2027-04-01 onward, expect that mapping to begin.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Practical implication: if you already have UN38.3, CE, and FCC in your documentation pack, GB 47372-2026 adds perhaps two weeks of paper review and one round of pre-shipment testing. It is not the certification overhaul some factory reps have been pitching.<\/p>\n<h2>Your B2B Procurement Checklist Before April 2027<\/h2>\n<p>Below is the document you want on the table the next time you sit down with an OEM\/ODM partner to lock a 500-piece run. Eight items, no fluff.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Full standard text or executive summary.<\/strong> Ask for the GB 47372-2026 PDF or a structured summary your factory has extracted. If they cannot produce one, that is your first signal.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Test report from a CNCA-accredited lab.<\/strong> The report should reference GB 47372-2026 by name and by clause. Older reports citing only GB 31241 or generic lithium-ion standards do not satisfy the new clause.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Compliance path declaration.<\/strong> Path 1, 2, or 3, written down. If Path 2 or 3, ask which panel or which radio module, with the specific part number.<\/li>\n<li><strong>UN38.3 reference and transport mode statement.<\/strong> Keep this attached to the PO. Air freight will ask for it regardless of GB 47372.<\/li>\n<li><strong>App or service-mode documentation.<\/strong> For Path 3, ask for the user manual and the factory-side diagnostic procedure. For Path 1, ask for the service-mode read-out flow only.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Display firmware update policy.<\/strong> This sounds small until your SKUs are sitting in retail. Make sure the factory has a firmware-over-update cadence or a clear policy that the firmware is locked.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Five-year archival statement.<\/strong> The standard asks for five-year retention of test reports. Make sure your factory can commit to that.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Recall and warranty workflow.<\/strong> GB 47372-2026 puts the burden of abnormal-event logging on the unit. Your warranty process has to read those logs when a customer complains. Make sure that process exists before, not after, the first defect.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Most seasoned Yulida buyers start with items 1-4 and leave 5-8 for the second conversation. Items 6 and 8 are the two that bite brands the most often. They look like software concerns but they are really service-design concerns.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<h2>Questions fr\u00e9quentes About GB 47372-2026<\/h2>\n<h3>Is GB 47372-2026 mandatory for power banks exported outside China?<\/h3>\n<p>No. The standard applies to power banks <em>placed on the Chinese market<\/em>. If your units are produced in China but exported without entering the Chinese consumer channel, the binding force on your shipments is indirect: only the factories serving the China market must comply, and the regulator expects those factories to standardize their lines. In practice, a factory running a fully GB 47372-2026 line will usually not maintain a second, non-compliant line for export only. So the cheapest sourcing plan is to assume compliance regardless of destination.<\/p>\n<h3>Does GB 47372-2026 require every power bank to have a screen?<\/h3>\n<p>No. The standard requires a <em>user-visible channel<\/em> for abnormal event information, which can be satisfied by a screen, an app, or a service-mode interface. Some press coverage has paraphrased the clause as a screen mandate, but the actual text allows three paths.<\/p>\n<h3>What is the difference between GB 47372-2026 and GB 31241?<\/h3>\n<p>GB 31241 governs lithium-ion cells and battery packs used <em>inside<\/em> portable electronic devices. GB 47372-2026 governs the <em>external mobile power supply<\/em> (the unit you charge your phone with). They overlap on cell safety but differ in scope: GB 31241 cannot substitute for GB 47372-2026, and vice versa.<\/p>\n<h3>Is GB 47372-2026 the same as China 3C (CCC) certification for power banks?<\/h3>\n<p>No. GB 47372-2026 is a national technical standard. China Compulsory Certification (CCC) is the certification scheme run by CNCA that turns various standards into a formal mark. The two will be linked once the regulatory body maps GB 47372-2026 into the CCC catalog. Until then, GB 47372-2026 compliance is technically voluntary except where contractually committed.<\/p>\n<h3>Can a mobile app replace the LCD display for compliance?<\/h3>\n<p>Yes, under Path 3. A BLE-or-Wi-Fi-paired app that reads the same parameters (voltage, current, temperature, fault codes) meets the user-visible channel requirement. Most retail-grade Path 3 builds pair the app with a small LCD anyway, because users expect to see a percentage without pulling out their phone.<\/p>\n<h3>When do I need to start sourcing GB 47372-compliant inventory for China sales?<\/h3>\n<p>Any production run whose shipping date falls on or after April 1, 2027 must be GB 47372-2026 compliant. The 12-month transition window allows dual-spec builds for inventory planned to ship before that date, but the soft recommendation is to migrate specifications before Q4 2026 so you are not running two parallel SKUs into late 2027.<\/p>\n<h3>What documents should I request from my OEM\/ODM partner to prove compliance?<\/h3>\n<p>At minimum: (a) the GB 47372-2026 test report from a CNCA-accredited lab; (b) a written compliance path declaration stating which of the three paths your SKU uses; (c) supporting certification paperwork: UN38.3 for transport, and SRRC\/FCC\/CE for any radio-enabled variants; (d) a five-year archival commitment for test reports and abnormal event logs.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>If you are weighing the BOM impact of a display-equipped variant versus a BLE-app variant for your next 500-piece run, reach out to the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/fr\/oem-odm-services\/\">YULIDA OEM\/ODM team<\/a> with your spec sheet. We have shipped GB 47372-aware configurations to brand partners across Europe, North America, and the Middle East, and we can quote a per-unit compliance lift on both paths in 24-48 hours. For a wider primer on the Yulida Power supply chain and our 28-point QC checklist, see the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/fr\/\">YULIDA homepage<\/a> or browse our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/fr\/faq\/\">frequently asked questions<\/a>. If you are still mapping the China compliance calendar against your private-label launch date, our team can mark the relevant milestones on your production timeline.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>China&#8217;s GB 47372-2026 power bank standard takes effect April 1, 2027. Compare 3 B2B compliance paths, decision matrix, and OEM checklist for 500-piece MOQ runs.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":20152,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[101],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-20137","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20137","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=20137"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20137\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21100,"href":"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20137\/revisions\/21100"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/20152"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=20137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=20137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.yulidapower.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=20137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}